Lots of POV talk around for us writing junkies. Here's Elizabeth Bear on limited third and omniscient, with a bit more on omniscient. And here's Karen Palmer on first person (link ganked from Booksquare).

I've written two books now, one in first and one in tightly limited third, and I disagree slightly with Bear in that I find the two very different indeed. I also disagree with Palmer (ooh. Contentious today, aren't we?) in that, for me, first worked almost exactly opposite than it did for her. It was in third that I struggled with the default voice and finding a point of view for my character that wasn't either exactly like mine or soppily self-involved. Thinly disguised wish fufillment autobiography, in other words, also known as "writing a Mary Sue". In first, the character's voice came through with such terrifying clarity that I was blown away.

Of course, in my original attempts at writing that story third person, I not only didn't fully grasp POV but was writing an adolescent female who closely resembled me. It wasn't until I read a LeGuin article on POV and did the suggested exercise, writing a given scene from three seperate points of view, that I stumbled on the idea of writing first person. And the first person character just happened to be in her twenties (several years older than me) and was convinced she had no emotions*, which made her a rather good observer. So perhaps I just lucked out there.

On the other hand....

I've been hanging out on writer's boards for several years now, and in every debate or advice session, someone will say, "Don't do X. I did X when I first started writing, and it was crap, and then I switched to doing Y and whammo! My writing got better!"

This happens with such frequency that I suspect a deeper reason: the easy way sucks, no matter what the easy way may be. Most of us, as writers, started out writing in the way that was most convenient to us - that is, required the least thought or effort. Then we ditch the no-thought method and do something that is a struggle for us. We attribute the improvement in writing to the change in method, not our own change in attitude from "writing as play" to "writing as requiring effort" because, well, we don't like admitting we weren't trying hard enough before. It's ever so much nicer to think you've discovered the cure for cancer than to realize it was lying on the bedroom floor under the laundry where you'd have found it long ago if you'd bothered tidying up.

This can lead to two problems. The first (and I am not talking about either Bear or Palmer here, both of whom wrote excellent and non-lecturing essays. Come to think of it, I haven't been talking of them for some time. I'm a writer. It's all about me...) is that you may be tempted to order less experienced writers around: "Never use first! Never use omniscient!" Hang about any writers' group for a month or so and you will watch this happen. Advice is grand, advice is good, but what some fail to realize is that what worked for them may not work for others.

The second is that you as a writer may end up denying yourself valuable tools. I was very hesitant, when I started the current Damned Book, to write in third; I remembered the first book too well. But it was in my head as third, so I started, and suprise! No problem any more. Joey is just as strong a voice as my first-person character and no one could possibly mistake her for me. The method wasn't the problem; my attitude towards writing the first time I used it was.

Now I just need to work my courage up enough to use omniscient, which, aside from being a bugger to spell, is a whole new ballgame. Hmm. Maybe in a year or two....


* She was also convinced that she existed to kill people. Whenever I spent too much time writing her I would find myself stalking around campus in a trenchcoat staring coldly at people. This is the danger of first person.

Type-In Revisions: 147 pages (of 385)
Word Count, Original and Current: 118,040 / 118,560
Notes: I just love it when my only hint that I've swapped the scene order is getting halfway through a scene and realising the revisions I'm typing in reference a scene that happens in the future. I guess I thought I'd remember. Bad Kat.

posted at 08:57 AM on 09/24/05 by kat - Category: General
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Comments

Julia wrote:

On POV - I read something by Madeleine L'Engle in which she discussed a writing assignment she often gave in writing classes: 1) Write a scene. Then later, 2) Write the same scene from a different POV. One student wrote a scene in which there was no one but the main character -- and an old, beloved tree that was destroyed by a lightning strike. After the initial "I can't!" reaction to the second assignment, the student wrote something really, really good, from the POV of the tree.

So you can always change POV if that's what's needed. (If that's not what's needed, then don't!)
09/25/05 10:47 PM

Add Comments

 


"Consider yourself a great orator if you can talk yourself into unpleasant duties."

Syrus


The To Be Read Pile
Blogs


Recent Posts

Archives
May 2011
January 2011
November 2010
April 2010
March 2010
July 2009
January 2009
November 2008
August 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
March 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002

Browse By Category